Predictive maintenance
Replaces the component before it fails and not a shift earlier, using sensor drift, load history and failure genealogy across the fleet.
- Moves
- Unplanned downtime hours
- Twin
- Asset Twin
- Capability
- Sensor ML + survival models
03 — Manufacturing & Industrials
Asset, plant and supply chain twins that connect OEE, yield and service margin to a single financial number — and agents that hold the gain across shifts.
North Star
Contribution margin per constrained hour
The value engine, end to end
The same six moves we run everywhere, expressed in the physics of this industry.
Where is the true constraint?
Constraint and value map
What drives yield, downtime and cost?
Causal process model
What if we re-sequence or re-spec?
Plant + network twin
Who acts within the shift?
Scheduling and maintenance agents
Is it safe and standard-compliant?
IEC 62443 + safety case
Does OEE hold?
Outcome contract + drift monitor
Where the value is
Before a twin is built, we agree where the money sits and what moves it.
Value pool
Asset availability
Driver
Unplanned downtime, MTBF
Measured as
Constrained hours recovered
Value pool
Yield & quality
Driver
Scrap, rework, first-pass yield
Measured as
Material and rework cost
Value pool
Supply chain
Driver
Inventory turns, expedite freight, OTIF
Measured as
Working capital released
Value pool
Aftermarket
Driver
First-time-fix, contract attach
Measured as
Service margin per install base unit
Use cases
Each one is a number somebody already owns, a twin that models it, and an agent that moves it inside a defined authority. Filter by function.
9 use cases
Replaces the component before it fails and not a shift earlier, using sensor drift, load history and failure genealogy across the fleet.
Catches the defect at the station that caused it instead of at final inspection, and feeds the cause back into the line settings.
Finds the combination of settings that holds yield under real variation in material, ambient conditions and shift.
Screens design and material combinations against cost, performance and manufacturability before tooling is committed.
Scores every supplier continuously on delivery, financial and geopolitical signal, and pre-positions the second source before a line stops.
Reroutes inventory to where it will actually sell or be consumed, and updates the resource plan when the assumption breaks — not at the next planning cycle.
Positions spares against predicted failure rather than historic consumption, cutting both stockouts and dead stock.
Models where energy is consumed against output and schedules load to the cheapest, cleanest window without missing the promise date.
Reads incident reports and site imagery for the pattern behind near-misses, and closes the loop with the control that prevents them.
Outcome twins
Each twin owns a set of levers. Each feature moves one lever. Each agent executes inside a defined authority.
Predict failure and schedule intervention against production value, not calendars.
Levers
Features
Multi-agent layer
Maintenance Planner Agent
Sequences work orders against constrained hours.
Hold the recipe at the profitable setpoint under real variation.
Levers
Features
Multi-agent layer
Yield Agent
Recommends and logs setpoint moves for operator approval.
Simulate demand, supply and logistics before committing inventory.
Levers
Features
Multi-agent layer
Allocation Agent
Re-allocates supply to highest-margin demand.
Turn the install base into predictable aftermarket margin.
Levers
Features
Multi-agent layer
Dispatch Agent
Matches technician, part and window in one pass.
Unit economics
Set your volume, switch features on or off, and move each impact to your own evidence. Everything is expressed per produced unit.
Units produced per year
2,400,000
Contribution per produced unit
$17
Per-unit contribution; use constrained-hour economics for capital-intensive lines.
Annual program investment
$3.5m
Asset Twin
Volume — Output from recovered uptime
3.5% — Unplanned downtime converted to sellable hours.
$1.4m
annual value
Process Twin
Unit cost — Scrap and energy
3.0% — Less variation per unit produced.
$5.1m
annual value
Supply Network Twin
Unit revenue — Revenue per unit
1.5% — Supply steered to higher-margin demand.
$3.2m
annual value
Supply Network Twin
Leakage — Logistics leakage
22.0% — Fewer premium freight events per quarter.
$3.7m
annual value
Service Twin
Unit cost — Service cost per unit
1.5% — Fewer repeat visits on the install base.
$2.6m
annual value
Value by feature
Annual value contributed by each active feature at current settings.
Value and ROI vs volume
How engineered value and ROI move as units produced per year change. The marker is your current setting.
Cumulative value vs investment
Where the curve crosses the investment line is payback.
Value mix by lever
Which lever the engineered value is actually coming from.
Baseline contribution
$40.8m
Engineered annual value
$16.0m
ROI on program
357%
Payback
2.6 months
Directional model. In an engagement every number here is replaced by your measured baseline, signed off by finance, and written into the outcome contract before any agent goes live.
Scale
Instrument the constraint, prove hours recovered.
Replicate to parallel lines with shared model library.
Cross-plant allocation and one margin number.
Integrations
Vendor-agnostic by design. Connectors are added per engagement — no platform lock-in.
OT & MES
ERP & PLM
Supply chain
Data & cloud
Regulations and standards
Compliance is a design input, not a review gate. Every agent action is logged, attributable and reversible.
EU AI Act
Safety-component AI in machinery: conformity and oversight.
EU Machinery Regulation
Boundary between advisory agents and safety functions.
NIS2
OT cyber resilience and incident reporting.
REACH / RoHS
Material and substance traceability in decisions.
CSRD
Energy and emissions data used in optimisation must be reportable.
Standards supported
Next industry
Retail & Consumer